Adreno530 @ 510 MHz is a entry level Graphics Processing Unit designed for mobile CPUs which are used in tablets and phones, date of announcement 2015. The Graphics Processing Unit manufactured using 14 nm process technology. Adreno 530 has 256 ALUs working at 510 MHz and works with graphics, or in simple terms the GPU helps games look well and more attractive and pleasing to the eye, for Earlyprocessor benchmarks didn't wipe out the competition, but maybe the new Adreno 530 GPU could impress. Qualcomm promised a 40% performance improvement on top of a 40% power reduction over the Phonesgpu: adreno 530 or higher By the way, it allows the use of up to three cameras simultaneously with a quality of 25 megapixels at 30 FPS. It should not be missed is that it arrives Qualcomm Spectra together with the Adreno 530 and 510 GPUs, which is a 14-bit image processing unit and, therefore, to achieve a greater warmth when taking pictures. Itis a 64-bit 14 nm mobile CPU. According to the manufacturer, CPU performance is twice as high as that of Snapdragon 810. Also, the chip features four Kryo cores - two ticking at 2.15 GHz and other two - at 1.6 GHz. Furthermore, there is an update of the GPU - the new Adreno 530 brings 40% better GPU performance (when compared to Adreno Vay Nhanh Fast Money. The Radeon 530 is a dedicated entry-level graphics card for laptops that was released in 2017. According to AMD, there are several different versions with 384 or 320 shader units and DDR3 or GDDR5 64-bit graphics memory. However, they are not based on one of the newer RX series Polaris chips, but most likely using the same architecture as the Radeon R7 M445 / M440 / M340 / M260 / 8650M / 8590M 384 shader units, 28 nm GCN and M430 / M330 / M230 320 shader units, 28 nm Sun GCN. AMD claims that the clock speed of the Radeon 530 can reach 1,024 MHz. Considering the above, the game performance of the Radeon 530 should fall between the Radeon R7 M440 320 shader units, DDR3, Radeon R7 M460 384 shader units, DDR3 and Radeon R7 M445 320 shader units, GDDR5 see these pages for detailed gaming benchmarks. Graphically intensive games such as Dishonored 2, Call of Duty Infinite Warfare or XCOM 2 should not run smoothly on this GPU. Less demanding games like Overwatch, Fifa 17 with a fast CPU, or Farming Simulator 17, would run well, but using low to medium detail settings. For detailed game benchmarks, visit the pages of the previously linked cards. According to the specs, the DDR3 version could be slower than the Radeon 520, that is specified with 320 shaders and 500 SeriesRadeon 530 384 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzRadeon 520 320 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzArchitectureGCNPipelines384 - unifiedCore Speed1024 MHzMemory Speed2250 MHzMemory Bus Width64 BitMemory TypeDDR3, GDDR5Max. Amount of Memory2048 MBShared MemorynoAPIDirectX 12, Shader OpenGL nmFeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL VulkanDate of Link to Manufacturer Page Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Scoremin 486 avg 514 median 497 2% max 559 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphicsmin 424 avg median 443 1% max 490 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 69759 avg 105231 median 107458 13% max 136248 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 43413 avg 52303 median 49386 7% max 67025 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Scoremin 3749 avg 6603 median 6371 7% max 8707 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphicsmin 6266 avg 8145 median 9210 2% max 9466 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Scoremin 1062 avg 1419 median 1386 0% max 1810 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphicsmin 1224 avg 1579 median 1542 2% max 1990 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphicsmin 56520 avg 67535 median 8% max 89565 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Scoremin 2121 avg 2496 median 2508 4% max 2935 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPUmin 2113 avg 2355 median 2327 2% max 2654 Points 3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. totalmin 6283 avg 6338 median 2% max 6392 Points 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysXmin 5074 avg 5369 median 3% max 5663 Points 3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standardmin 16614 avg 17513 median 17513 19% max 18412 Points 3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +3DMark 06min 9517 avg 11377 median 11481 16% max 13132 Points Unigine Valley - Unigine Valley DXmin avg median 2% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven DX 11min avg 17 median 17 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven OpenGLmin avg median 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Heaven highmin avg 20 median 20 4% max fps Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading 32bit +Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading 32bitmin 5166 avg 7436 median 7731 5% max 9411 points Cinebench Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench - Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 10% max fps Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 11% max fps Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bitmin avg 98 median 98 98% max 98 % GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 3% max fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin avg median 12% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin avg median 3% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Room GPUmin 189 avg median 1% max 222 Samples/s LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Sala GPUmin 353 avg median 1% max 420 Samples/s ComputeMark - ComputeMark Resultmin 741 avg 992 median 895 1% max 1341 points Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *min 43 avg median 12% max 58 Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiencymin avg median 13% max Points per Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Points per Watt 15% Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultraClock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksVery Low Overall Quality DX11 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksLowest Preset 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested BenchmarksLow Preset TAA 1920x1080 low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 high 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. low 1280x720 med. 1920x1080 » With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low. Qualcomm Adreno 430 vs Qualcomm Adreno 530Qualcomm Adreno 430 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Adreno 430 is an integrated graphics card for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the beginning of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 SoC. The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender. It can switch "intelligently" between TBR TBR Tile Based Renderer and the classic direct rendering. It supports OpenGL ES and DirectX Feature Level 11_1 compared to ES and DirectX 9_3 of the Adreno 330. The GPU uses 192 unified shaders clocked at up to 650 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. It positions itself between the PowerVR GX6450 in the Apple A8 and the ARM Mali-T760 MP8 in the Samsung Exynos 7420. Although the Snapdragon 810 is already manufactured in 20nm, heat can still be an issue especially in smartphones. This leads to reduced clock rates and performance during continuous Adreno 530 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES and DirectX The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding in Adreno 430GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboQualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM89948 x 2000 MHz? MHz650 MHzCPU in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboQualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHzQualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHzmin. - max.? MHz624 - 653 MHzBenchmarks3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 24558 avg 34338 median 36316 4% max 38394 Points min 24310 avg 32869 median 32997 4% max 40761 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited min 2649 avg 3348 median 3425 18% max 3806 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 3401 avg 4503 median 11% max 5006 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimitedmin 2252 avg 2605 median 16% max 2893 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 2488 avg 2996 median 3108 2% max 3253 Points GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 430 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 49 1% max 57 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 min avg median 56 2% max 88 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 430 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 49 0% max 58 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 min avg median 88 1% max 96 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin avg 23 median 7% max 45 fps min 23 avg median 32 9% max 48 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin avg median 24 1% max 27 fps min 26 avg 43 median 3% max 49 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 0% max 12 fps min avg median 13 0% max 20 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin avg median 0% max 12 fps min 14 avg median 19 0% max 20 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreenmin avg median 7 1% max 12 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreenmin avg median 1% max 11 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreenmin 12 avg median 15 2% max 19 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreenmin 15 avg median 19 1% max 19 fps Basemark ES - Basemark ES X - Basemark X High Qualitymin 15240 avg 20434 median 46% max 24085 Points min 21420 avg 30602 median 33028 75% max 35449 Points Basemark X - Basemark X Medium Qualitymin 25772 avg 30741 median 32020 71% max 34480 Points min 28538 avg 37215 median 38353 85% max 41500 Points NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 ScorePassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Testsmin 3217 avg 4949 median 5% max 5907 Points min 4781 avg 5512 median 6% max 6042 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Testsmin 1297 avg 1812 median 1647 3% max 2887 Points min 1913 avg 2183 median 4% max 2461 Points Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Indexmin 4138 avg 4346 median 4329 94% max 4540 Points Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 430 → 100% n=16Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 151% n=16 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. high 143% Adreno 5300 !30303030565859596060 ~ 43 fps low 120% Adreno 5302929303030303030303030 ~ 30 fps high 100% Adreno 5300 !29292930303030303030303048 ~ 29 fps Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 430 → 100%Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 121%Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 143%For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming 15. 0633510 checking url part for id 6189 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s 2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 111425 +0200 + ... 4 composed specs + ... 5 did output specs +0s ... 6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6189 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 6189 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 7062 + ... 11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 18 Got 44 rows for game benchmarks. + ... 19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 20 got data and put it in $dataArray + ... 21 benchmarks composed for output. + ... 22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 23 return log + ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 Adreno 530 650 MHz is a mid-range GPU designed for mobile CPUs which are used in phones and tablets, date of announcement 2015. The GPU manufactured using 14 nm process technology. Adreno 530 has 256 ALUs working at 650 MHz and works with graphics, or in simple terms the GPU helps games pleasing to the eye and seem well and more beautiful, for instance GTA, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9 and many others. You can understand Adreno 530 650 MHz GPU is good or bad from benchmark results and comparisons with other graphics processing 530 650 MHz GPU specificationsGeneral InfoNameAdreno 530Codename Generation5Frequency650 MHzALU256Process14 nmGFLOPs FP32 Single Precision GFLOPsTriangle Fillrate335 MT/sPixel GP/sMemory GB/sRelease date2015-12-01DisplayDirectX11Displays support2Video encoding/decodingJPEGDecode & EncodeAV1Decode & Encodeh264Decode & EncodeVP8Decode & EncodeVC-1Decode & Encodeh265/HEVC 8 bitDecode & EncodeVP9Decode & Encodeh265/HEVC 10 bitDecode & EncodeAVCDecode & EncodeTechnologyOpenGL ES 12,OpenCL VR video playback, 8K 360 VR video playback,Vulkan informationDynamic hardware tessellation, RenderScript, General-Purpose GPU GPGPU performance, Shared Virtual memory, Android Extension Pack, Advanced API supportAdreno 530 GPU 650 MHz review• GPU Fortnite Mobile• GPU Devices lists• GPU SoCs lists• GPU Benchmarks• GPU PUBG mobile• Antutu 8• 3DMark• GeekBench 5 mobileAdreno 530 GPU Comparisons• Vs Adreno 615 700MHz• Vs Adreno 610 750MHz• Vs PowerVR GM 9446 970MHz• Vs Adreno 540 710MHz• Vs Adreno 612 700MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP20 546MHz• Vs Adreno 616 500MHz• Vs Adreno 618 700MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP18 850MHz• Vs Mali-G52 MP2 850MHz• Vs PowerVR GM 9446 800MHz• Vs Mali-G76 MP5 700MHz• Vs Mali-G52 MP6 850MHz• Vs Adreno 630 650MHz• Vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 800MHz• Vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 900MHz• Vs Adreno 530 624MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP12 650MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP12 850MHz• Vs Adreno 512 850MHz• Vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 950MHz• Vs Adreno 509 850MHz• Vs PowerVR 7XTP-MT4 820MHz• Vs Mali-T760 MP8 772MHz• Vs Adreno 510 600MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP3 700MHz• Vs PowerVR GE8320 650MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP3 800MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP4 950MHz• Vs PowerVR GX6250 650MHz• Vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 820MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP18 546MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP4 900MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP4 875MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP8 1037MHz• Vs Mali-G71 MP3 1200MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP4 780MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP4 850MHz• Vs Adreno 530 510MHz• Vs Mali-G52 MP2 614MHz• Vs Mali-G72 MP4 800MHz• Vs PowerVR GM 9444 800MHz• Vs Mali-T880 MP10 650MHz• Vs Mali-T860 MP4 922MHz• Vs PowerVR GT7400 Plus 800MHz• Vs Mali-470 MP4 650MHz• Vs Mali-T604 MP4 533MHz• Vs Mali-T658 MP6 600MHz• Vs Mali-T678 MP8 700MHz• Vs Mali-G51 MP6 1000MHz• Vs PowerVR GT7600 900MHz• Vs PowerVR GT7600 650MHz• Vs Mali-G310 MP6 800MHz• Vs Mali-G57 MP1 650MHz• Vs Mali-G57 MP1 750MHz• Vs Mali-G710 MC10 850MHz• Vs Mali-G52 MP1 800MHz• Vs Adreno 730 900MHz• Vs Adreno 740 980MHz• Vs Adreno 725 950MHz• Vs Mali-G57 MC1 2EE 750MHz

hp gpu adreno 530